@j.m it’s all good. Nice to be able to have a calm exchange of opinions w/o it flaring up into a huge battle.
I’m in the next batch, so hoping the boat lands on/before June 1.
2 Likes
dude this place is a nice getaway from all that
here we seem to be sharing words without the awfulness we encounter elsewhere , so far, at least and i think if we all try , then long may it continue
i hope mine is here soon, been a year nearly now… i just keep looking at the benefit of picking up the machine after much FW dev… 
2 Likes
OT and this will be great mates is my guess, that is my hope at least cuz my OT are my hands basically - i believe they will mesh perfectly, both have limitations and the user finds his own way around them
2 Likes
I hope so. I think the differences can be made up with a lot of love
2 Likes
yes - both are 8 trk monsters and both are hands on machines meant for fun
2 Likes
- 1 from me as well.
I absolutely respect and love the simplicity of the s2400 UI philosophy but would be delighted if 1-2 LFOs get added even if it’s simple shapes / routing. I could absolutely live with them on a sub menu if keeps the main functions prioritized.
Definitely a WANT not a NEED but it would be a powerful featured that unlocks certain sound design choices.
5 Likes
+1 for 1 or optimally 2 LFO with as much functionality as possible (random please).
4 Likes
LFOs would be great but I think multistage envelopes (no need for sustain phases, but maybe Attack, Decay
and Hold stages that can be added/subtracted) that can auto - cycle might be more interesting and flexible . So you can get AD, AHD or crazy modulation contours (ie, AHDHAD) , but if you want, but can act as an LFO if you turn on autocycle.
Especially powerful with a mod matrix!
4 Likes
I’m bumping this one as I actually have the S2400 now and I’ve been simulating simple LFO in playback override - basically wobbling a long fat kick. It sounds awesome. Please can we have an LFO! 
Could be implemented something like this, and easy to ignore if you don’t want it:
Track Settings /
LFO Modulation [tick on/off]
LFO Waveform [sine / square / tri / ramp up / ramp down]
LFO Destination [pitch / volume / pan / sample start]
LFO Amount [0-100]
LFO Delay [0-100] (this adjusts the time to the LFO starting)
4 Likes
Was going to add this request until I found this one. I think that it is absolutely ridiculous that in 2021 samplers have been reduced to 1-shot players when we had advanced synthesis capabilities running on hardware from the 1980s. Obviously, this is meant to be a recreation of a one-shot groovebox but given that Isla is already expanding its envelopes, filtering capabilities and even adding timestretching, I see no reason why a track couldn’t be used to make monophonic basslines or why a kit couldn’t be used to make a polyphonic synth. MPCs could do this since the MPC2000.
LFOs allow for very complex sounds especially with a mod matrix that allows ADSR To be mapped to LFOs. If crossfade looping is ever implemented, I would have no need for my rack sampler
1 Like
LFOs with random for sample start or envelpe decays would be divine. It would add a ton of ‘organicness’ to an already super organic sounding sampler.
5 Likes
Just chiming in to say yes to all the above + the desire for filter frequency and filter resonance as destination options
4 Likes
I’m just going to jump on the bandwagon here.
I’d rather have 1 or 2 assignable LFOs per part than more voices.
Being able to modulate the filter envelope, amplitude, etc. would open this box up in a huge way.
Coolest thing about it to me: using mute groups with volume or filter modulation to fake a sidechain effect.
Also would be cool to use a square on 16 level volume so I can make my snare and hats note repeat with fake gravity… drags, flams, rolls, etc…Bouncy ball effect is always fun.
Lfo1 to custom scales [square] with another clOcked LFO2 or looping envelope modulating LFO1 frequency… now I’m in C64 arpeggiator heaven.
It would be cool. That’s all I’m sayin.
6 Likes
i just mentioned in another thread how useful a random lfo would be to create a round robin effect from sliced samples
i use the octatrcak this way a lot - i do not want this to be my octatrack just for the record all , i just use the reference due to the way they allow lfo to trig per hit/step/fraction of step - it is a super way to add life to audio
4 Likes
+1 for sure, im in full agreement. def not a NEED for this machine, but having them nonetheless would be great
4 Likes
Lot’s of great updates recently!
Don’t know if LFO modulation is on the roadmap but it would be extremely welcome from quite a few of us wobbly types. So a little bump from me.
5 Likes
+1 - LFOs would be a great addition…
5 Likes
LFO yes please
3 Likes
+1—but I would be happy with just some onboard effects too
5 Likes
Even only 1 Lfo would bring this machine in completely new territories…ofc I would love effects too!
6 Likes